Benchmarking News Recommendations in a Living Lab


Most user-centric studies of information access systems in literature suffer from unrealistic settings or limited numbers of users who participate in the study. In order to address this issue, the idea of a living lab has been promoted. Living labs allow us to evaluate research hypotheses using a large number of users who satisfy their information need in a real context. In this paper, we introduce a living lab on news recommendation in real time. The living lab has first been organized as News Recommendation Challenge at ACM RecSys'13 and then as campaign-style evaluation lab NEWSREEL} at CLEF’14. Within this lab, researchers were asked to provide news article recommendations to millions of users in real time. Different from user studies which have been performed in a laboratory, these users are following their own agenda. Consequently, laboratory bias on their behavior can be neglected. We outline the living lab scenario and the experimental setup of the two benchmarking events. We argue that the living lab can serve as reference point for the implementation of living labs for the evaluation of information access systems.

  address = {Sheffield, {UK}},
  title = {Benchmarking News Recommendations in a Living Lab},
  url = {},
  booktitle = {{CLEF}'14: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the {CLEF} Initiative},
  publisher = {Springer Verlag},
  author = {Hopfgartner, Frank and Kille, Benjamin and Lommatzsch, Andreas and Brodt, Torben and Heintz, Tobias},
  year = {2014},
  pages = {250--267}
Frank Hopfgartner, Benjamin Kille, Andreas Lommatzsch, Till Plumbaum, Torben Brodt, Tobias Heintz
CLEF'14: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the CLEF Initiative